Menu

In an attempt to avoid litigating before a jury, employers routinely include arbitration provisions in employment agreements. But courts will not enforce an arbitration agreement that does not provide essential fairness to employees – such agreements are called “unconscionable.”

In construction projects, it’s not unusual today for engineers, consultants, and other specialists to be asked for advice even on seemingly minor aspects of the work. If something later goes wrong, how should responsibility be apportioned among what may be the many consultants who were in some way involved?

Any legal document must be prepared with care, but some are likely to be scrutinized especially closely by courts that are sensitive to the impact they can have, especially if one party has far greater resources than the other.

Arbitration is intended as a faster, less expensive alternative to traditional litigation, and is often an effective way to resolve relatively minor disputes, such as those between a company and a customer. But what if the conflict involves serious claims, and may affect the general public?

For closely held companies, a frequently used estate planning strategy is to have the company buy life insurance policies on each major shareholder to fund the buyout of the shareholder’s shares in the event of his or her death. A recent decision by the Supreme Court requires a fresh look at this approach.

It’s certainly not unusual for at least one member of a formerly married couple to express hostile feelings after a divorce. But when this goes further and becomes abusive behavior, what options are available to the spouse being attacked?